In search of behavioural and process enablers that result in individual fulfillment and institutional achievement!
Monday, October 22, 2012
Emails!
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Rhythm!
-
Would you associate the word 'rhythm' with word/terms 'stretch' or 'burning the midnight oil'?
If rhythm (what we do as part of our day-to-day work) causes us to 'burn midnite oil' over a significant period of time, what does it tell us?
For a start, it tells me that things aren't in rhyhm/flow.
- Work unit may be understaffed.
- Work plans/processes may have redundant (can be removed) process steps
- There might be too many 'streams of rhythm/flow' running simultaneously. This might cause a sense of lack of rhythm in the larger picture .
Well! I will be intentional about finding out and finding back a daily rhythm in life and work.
-
Sourav
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Language We Use at Work
Language we use supposedly influences what our mind focuses on. So if we say that ‘I want to have an ice-cream’, our mind focuses on ice-cream and that’s where our energy is drawn. But if we say that ‘I don’t want to have an ice-cream; even then our mind focuses on ice-cream, but not on the ‘no’, and our energies are drawn towards ice-cream again.
So a better way of saying that ‘I don’t want to have an ice-cream’ maybe would be to say ‘I feel like dieting today’ J. That’s the closest I could get to forming a positive, affirmative statement in this case.
If we were to implement this learning in the organizational context, what all organizational terminologies/phrases would change?
Let me talk of a few commonly used organizational terminologies and their possible ‘more positive’ alternate.
- 0% offer rejects or 100 % offer accepts (in recruitment)?
- 0% employee attrition or 100 % employee retention?
- Compensation or Rewards?
- Reduce Dissatisfaction or Increase Engagement?
- Reduce conflict or Increase co-operation/collaboration?
- Don’t make mistakes or Do things right?
- Think out of the box or Think in another box?
- 0% deviation or 100 % compliance?
- Don’t intellectualize too much or Its time to action?
- Do things beyond ordinary or Innovate?
- Don’t be so task focused or Be task and people focussed?
- Don’t be inauthentic/artificial or Be authentic and genuine?
- Don’t be harsh/nasty or Be sensitive?
- Reduce stress or Enjoy and be happy?
I can instantly relate to the 2nd option in each of the above cases.
I could also think of how some of the language we use outside work can undergo changes too:
- I want to lose weight or I want to be in shape?
- I want to reduce my health problems or I want to be healthy?
- I don’t want a meaningless and boring life or I want a meaningful life?
What are some of the languages, terminologies, and phrases you use that you might want to change?
Can you think of some other ‘negative focussed’ terminologies/phrases frequently used at work?
What ‘positive focused’ terminology/phrase can we use instead of their ‘negative focused’ counterparts?
-
Sourav
Friday, October 21, 2011
A Meaningful Life!
So what should our focus be: Work or Life? Do we live to work or do we work to live?
Maybe we need both. Work and Life are integral parts of our existence and hence probably the focus on ‘Work- Life balance’.
But then why do we separate work and life? Are we saying that work has no life and life has no work?
I disagree! Some year’s back I realized that work and life are intertwined and inseperable. Why do I say so? Well, I’ll probably talk about that in a different post.
Let me devote this post to a journey I have been living through over last year. A journey best described as ‘There is more to life than work and life’.
Life is not all about working hard and partying hard/enjoying to the fullest.
But that requires us to first relook at the definition of work and what we expect from it.
We have our own preferences, interests, and aspirations. We look at work as a platform which would provide us/allow us to completely express ourselves or be ourselves. Is that a reasonable expectation? We play a certain role at work and that role may not have the scope for us to do work which we find ‘complete meaning’ in.
Charles Handy talks of an inverse doughnut. We have an inner circle which is our work, but we also have a series of outer circles which represent the other things that we want to do. I like the way he verbalizes it ‘What work would you be willing to do at ‘zero’ cost/salary?”. These ‘zero costed’ set of work would constitute the outer circles of the doughnut and provides significant opportunities for us to do meaningful work and grow.
So there are two questions which we need to ask ourselves:
- At work, what work do I want to do a) beyond my KPI’s?, b)that doesn’t necessarily furthers my career growth?
- Beyond work, what work do I want to do even though I may get zero money for it or maybe to have pay some money out of my pocket to do that work?
We can be nostalgic our past, build for our future, but we can create only in the present. Are we creating enough in the present to feel that we are leading meaningful lives?
As a manager, what we can do is probably sensitize our team members to the question “What all would you want to do for zero salary or non-monetary benefit?”. We may not get an answer straight off but atleast we have got our team members to start thinking about what gives meaning to them.
-
Sourav